Monday, August 27, 2012

word to John


Every Poets Says I Am !!!

I am I
I am inspiration
Perspiration
Recognition of the invisible, indivisible
I am inspiration
The spark of innovation
Greenovation – I am
The stand in the ovation
I am breath – length of days and strength of sunrays
I am the surge in the rivers urge
The move – the flow – the moonglow
I am respiration
Inhale!
The quick and the sudden death
Uwafa wafa wama wabanjwa ngabaza wabhajwa
Wasaba washaywa
I am the scent of the smoke
The invisible footprint the leopard sprint     i-smile sofudu
i-texture yo-phutu
I am the weight of the smoke The malice in the Rastaman’s chalice
I am the idea of a man
The Ethiopic topic the u in the utopic
The eclectic eccentric, never am I ever myopic I stick to the topic
Hot as the tropic My wingspan Angelic Black like acrylic I am Will I Am John Coltranic!!!

inkondlo


Listening 

I am Travelling Light
Illuminating the night
I have long conquered doubts or impulses to fight
So that I can break into free flight
And so I travel      
From ear to ear
Breaking both the silence
And the ignorance
Mine and yours
His and hers

Cause Poetry can feel as hard as diamonds or soft and lush as furs
These are not metaphors
But the thoughts of a used man
Or a man too used to having used to be a man
Breaking the silence of abused men
Tracing the tear of misused women
And I travel light
My bag’s not heavy with books
But each time I open it,
 I get looks
As if I’ve just snatched some fine woman’s Louis Vuitton
But before you know
What’s in it
I’m gone

Thursday, August 16, 2012

Morris Brown Outkast

Wasted Seed

Zeroing In On Waste: The Uses and Abuses of Climate Change
When sunny Durban hosted the 17th Conference of the Parties (COP17) to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and the Kyoto Protocol (CMP7), there were many expectations and the excitement was palpable. Before D-Day, which was the Monday of 28 November 2011, the eThekwini Municipal Manager Dr Michael Sutcliffe offered R600- million as a guestimate based on an average daily estimate of 25 000 visitors spending R60-million per day for three whole weeks.
To those who followed this crucial spectacle, it’s clear that the final sessions were stretched for about 2 to 3 days; one therefore wonders if the City of Durban ended up paying much more than the R200-million it initially budgeted for. The point of this essay is to ascertain whether all this was worth it or is it another wasted expense costing the already ailing global economy billions and also further depleting our meagre energy potential.
The parties to the convention have met annually since 1995 as COP to assess progress in dealing with Climate Change. In 1997, the Kyoto Protocol established legally binding obligations for developed countries to reduce their Greenhouse emissions. So COP17 seeks to secure global climate agreements as the Kyoto Protocols first commitment period (2008-2012) is ending. Many opinion makers emphasised that success at COP17 negotiations ultimately rested on China’s diplomatic skills. Industrializing countries with constrained resources such as China and India were set no binding targets at COP3, in Kyoto, in 1997.
During COP15, which was held in 2009 in Copenhagen, No binding agreement for long term climate change action was reached, although a ‘political accord’ was adopted by 25 parties including the USA and China; which included the first time a collective commitment by developed countries to provide additional resources totalling nearly US$30 billion by 2012 to mitigate against Climate Change. Now it is also instructive to note that there have been scores of suspicious conspiracy theories in the form of You-Tube video’s and blatant pseudo political propaganda documentaries issued by United States citizens who see themselves as defenders of democracy. Many of these ‘film-makers’ are vehemently opposed to the notion of Global Warming or Climate Change, they see all such conferences, UN and state backed initiatives as part of the global agenda to create more profits at the expense of poor citizens.
Now most ordinary African people had no clear idea what Climate Change was until the media blitz preceding COP17. A lot of younger people including myself have hardly even heard of the preceding conferences of the parties, yet we were always aware of what wanton pollution and exploitation is. What COP17 literally brought home was that it was mostly industrial emissions which contributed massively to polluting the atmosphere, provoking Climate Change and that the purported solution had to be “green energy” development. Yet we are hardly ever informed about the merits and demerits of wind power, hydro-power and the other ‘cleaner’ alternatives to fossil fuels. South Africa’s task in COP17 was to elicit contributions from developed economies to support the Green Climate Fund. The GCF is a UN mechanism to support programmes in developing countries to mitigate and eventually reverse the damage of Climate Change.
To someone like myself and the many other observers, COP17 and the developed countries are just wasting time and throwing money at a problem which requires more creativity, sacrifice and a willingness to change or transform old patterns of thought and civilisation. Surely the billions of figures mentioned in the first paragraph could be better spent on education, developing Indigenous Knowledge Systems & climate friendly technologies. But there is no great and one sided profit in such things for the multinational health, energy, fuel and mining industries, there are no corrupt politicians and local chiefs to bribe in a system that empowers people to get off their dependency on inefficient and expensive energy grids.
Our world suffers from the actions of a handful of greedy people, people whose lives and livelihoods are never affected by the nuclear fall-outs and adverse weather conditions that affect subsistence farmers and shack dwellers. If politicians were really the public servants that they are supposed to be, they would pass laws that not only restrict the subjugation of other people and the planet; they would also be obliged to use public health systems. A law that says public servants should utilize public utilities, housing, schools and transportation would place them in a position where they would empathise with the plight ordinary people.
Instead of waiting for global polluters to amend their ways and invest in a fund that impedes their overzealous greed for profit at all costs, local governments of developing countries should zero in on Zero Waste principles focussing on redesigning products and methods of production to eliminate waste by mimicking natural processes and developing closed loops. South Africa should be converting waste to resources for the benefits of local production and creation of healthy and sustainable living conditions, an awakened society.
Inextricably connected to global corporate greed is a deeply embedded culture of institutionalised racism, a matter which is conveniently shunned in such expensive talk-shops. The perpetrators cannot afford to be introspective and change their ways, there’s no money to be made in common sense.
Menzi Maseko ©


Monday, August 6, 2012

is it?

Black Music versus Jazz
The unfinished yet hush-hush battle between those who wish to do away with the term jazz and those who maintain that there is such a rich and multi-racial heritage inherent in it and has to be preserved rages on. Many music lovers may not see how the battle lines have been drawn and how this sentiment has been fomenting for the longest time, but ‘on’ it is and contrary to what the critics say, Nicholas Payton may very well be making a necessary revolutionary point when he asserts seriously:
I am Nicholas Payton and I don’t play “the j word.” I play BAM. BAM is an acronym for Black American Music.”
But then again, the forceful and innovative musician might be swimming against the tide and perhaps fighting a battle that he and his supporters just can’t win. Some of the critics of this new term – BAM happen to be excellent writers and opinion makers and many are not entirely against the ‘new’ name per se, but the sentiment or the intention behind it. As jazz critic and self-confessed jazz evangelist Scott Fugate puts it in a rather long-drawn-out article on the very subject:
“Anything that can be called truly “American” must represent all the races, cultures, religions, ages & tastes that are part of this great Nation . . . and we are also free to accept or reject it.
True to form, Americans on the whole tend to reject & ignore jazz. Many have never really listened to it – except in the guise of annoying background music – and even fewer have seen it performed live.” ( JazzTimes, )
But herein lies the crucial contradiction, reminding me of Gil Scott Heron’s witty song-poem, Is That Jazz, where he characteristically demystifies many of the clichés related to what jazz is or is not. The point is that here is a sound, a style, a cultural institution invented and forged in the fires of the joys and sorrows of a formerly enslaved people, which after being noticed to possess extraordinary and marketable qualities was also taken up by talented individuals, Jews, former Europeans and other ethnicities; developed, reformed, deformed and repackaged it for a universal audience, yet still remained the peculiar expression of the original people – Blacks.
So what if this not so –all American- blues, rag, swing, bop, funky amalgamation of folk and Afro-Latin influences has also been copied to perfection by other races? The fact remains that it is an expression cultivated and informed by much of the black universal and specifically Negro-American experience. Another writer confirms:
Take cool jazz, for example. The spate of subdued sounds that blew from the West Coast in the mid-‘50’s – elevating the careers of Chet Baker, Gerry Mulligan, Shorty Rogers and Dave Brubeck – seemed to the black community one more instance of white musicians profiting from black cultural invention, “I guess it was supposed to be some kind of alternative to bebop, or black music…but it was the same old story,” Miles Davis maintained in his biography, “black shit was being ripped off all over again.” – “Gerry Mulligan – active in both East and West Coast scenes of the day – later came to acknowledge the black perspective on the situation,, “I suppose it was later on that I realised that there was some reaction among the musicians themselves, some of whom resented the success of cool jazz in California, and that broke down into the white guys against the hard-blowing black guys in New York.”(Ashley Kahn, Jazztimes.com/articles, September 2001)
I must add that this happens to be another white jazz critic, so one wonders whether the perspective is biased towards the non-racial or multi-ethnic aspects of jazz or not, one will have to read the entire article to make a qualified judgement, suffice to say that this recurring theme of the racial over and undertones in the public history of music have not been sufficiently dealt with. This is what has kept so many excellent ideas and cultural institutions from flourishing.
Today one can still find teenage black boys playing Kenny G or David Sanborn and dare to call it jazz. The media, music industry and concert promoters have also dealt jazz another death blow as they are the ones who insists on lumping everyone from Rhythm and Blues to Deep House DJ’s who happen to bring along a few instruments (possible out of work jazz musicians) into what they call Jazz Festivals. The Hazelmere concerts in the North Coast of Kwazulu Natal and the misnomered North Sea Jazz Festival, which happens to be in the South sea - are a case in point. Everyone from Kwaito ‘artists’ to atrociously repetitive and out of tune Gospel and Afro-Pop singers have graced that stage.The ignorant fans come back home elated that they have had a cultural experience at the jazz. This is pure blasphemy and an outrageous slap in the face for the plethora of musicians, promoters, writers and lovers of jazz who have spent countless hours ‘digging’ this dexterous sound and are likely to either die poor or become eulogized in many anonymous moments of silence. But silence is what they have been offered while they were present and itching to live in a world that appreciates good art.
Alas, this is a world that rewards sensationalist mendacity and allows progressive movement to beat against high whitewashed walls. But perhaps there is hope. Has BAM come to save the dwindling social status of jazz, wrench it from abysmal obscurity? Well, that is a very complicated matter and might take many years and more than a name change to bring about. But returning to the racial aspects of it, the concert promoters and opinion makers love to mention that music is one thing that manages to bring people together on an equal platform. How true is that exactly? Can so many generations of collaboration, as unequal and irreversible as they are be accounted for in a name change? the abandonment of something so strenuously toiled for, can it bear any stranger fruits, or is it as Payton’s critics suggest, a mere marketing gimmick instigated by a selfish young musician who does not appreciate the heritage of his forebears – both black and white? Perhaps the challenge here is not just an attitude problem or one man’s fixation, perhaps it is not just the names jazz or Black American Music that are at stake.
The elephant in the room is obviously consumerist-capitalism and the lure of easy profit, right? The scores of white musicians, club-owners and gangsters, who benefitted, profited from the exploitation of black invention may not be the real target or the root of the problem; they just happened to find a ready-made idiom and simply built their own wealth and legacy upon it, right? Surely, in America, in the land of the free, this couldn’t have been such as bad idea, especially when many white jazz musicians and others who took the blues and turned it into profitable pop-rock clearly admit that they were never responsible for its invention. I mean, this is part of the great big juicy and sliceable American pie. This type of attitude should have been able to rescue the dignity of Black American Music from the onslaught of popular consumerist culture and the advent of MTV, but it did not. But on the other hand, European classical music still maintains its allure of dignified pomp and its shimmer of ingenuity. Even though there have been many black luminaries even in that genre who rose from the ignominy of slavery to become forgotten supernovae like St Gorge. The fact of their blackness ensures that they remain forgotten or enshrouded in myth, even though even among the purists, they were known to have excelled their white contemporaries in brilliant musicianship.
But this is an anti-black world and the sooner we realise this fact, the clearer we will find our way around the problem of racism and thus we would become fully realised and human again. At the moment we appear as mere labourers and an inconvenient yet tolerated human resource. Our stolen lands are also far from free from the exploitation of white supremacy, yes; it exists even in the arts, even those who would like to claim as our own inventions. In a non-racial, multi-racially diverse world, one is discouraged to claim anything exclusively. Our attempts to become self-sufficient and self-defining are kept at bay by the gods of race denialism–the Mandela’s, the Tutu’s and the Oprah Winfrey’s. But just like in the jazz world there remain those blacks who refuse to be used and misinformed by Eurocentric standards of success.
The Black Consciousness radical thinkers called Blackwash state it aptly:
Black poverty lies side by side with white wealth created from the exclusion and impoverishment of blacks. To escape we adopt a white attitude, we become half-white to continue sucking the blood of black people…To succeed is to sellout. We are not against comfort and success but we say look at how these are achieved. Meritocracy and hard work are lies to blind us from the truth of how exploitation and exclusion lies at the heart of success under the anti-black capitalist reality of our time.” – (The Blackwash dream: We fight for it now!, 2009)
What more can I say? All I know is that I love Black Music in general and what they call jazz in particular has a special part in my soul, but as a radical Black Consciousness adherent I will have to support Payton’s revolutionary stance, especially due to the fact that so many opposing voices like his music yet they see fit to deny him a chance to define in as he sees fit. I am also not surprise to see so much opposition coming from those critics of European descent who feel justified in denying a Black man his power of self-determination.
 In closing let me add just one more interesting example of this tendency of white people to take over the genius of black folks, in fact it seems as if many of them simply do it without noticing it, as if its just a natural thing to do. Take the story of the one I am listening to right now. This Django Reinhart & Stephane Grappelli album was a birthday gift from a nice old white lady I worked with. Out of all the millions of jazz albums I could get for my birthday, she had to ironically give me a rather serendipitous history lesson. Here’s a brief history note for you, as depicted in the album sleeve:
Django Reinhardt was born in Liberchies, Belgium, in 1910, a gypsy brought up on Eastern European music. Grappelli, born in Paris two years earlier, was a fan of American violinist Eddie South.” – Now check this out: From Wikipedia:
“Eddie South was a classical violin prodigy who switched to jazz because of limited opportunities for African-American musicians, and started his career playing in vaudeville and jazz orchestras with Freddie Keppard, Jimmy Wade, Charles Elgar and Erkstine Tate in Chicago. He was influenced by Hungarian music and Roma music starting with a visit to Europe in the 1920s and adapted the music to jazz. On subsequent visits to Europe in the 1930s he performed and recorded with guitarist Django Reinhardt and violinist Stephane Grappelli.”
Now one would note that in those times. America was not at all a happy place to be black. And many artists and writers of colour were forced to go ply their trade in Europe. But keeping this in mind and the brief biography of Reihardt, lo and behold what the latest collection of Eddie South music is called: Black Gypsy. It is exactly as the Blackwash comrades stated, in order to succeed; blacks have to either adopt a white attitude, a white persona or completely sell-out. What many writers have called selling your soul to the devil.
It can be construed that in the survival game that is live, especially the creative artists fickle world, it is all about survival and many a times, artistic integrity has cost many people their livelihood. But surely there is an elephant in the room here, and it’s the proverbial white elephant indeed. The obviously gifted Reinhardt is said to be a gypsy but he did not find it difficult to become a legend and a wealthy musician at that, he and his partner in musical plagiarism are still remembered and selling till this very day, but even I did not know much about Eddie South. I have had to see South through Northern eyes, a sort of cruel case of northern-exposure – finding ourselves and even our ancestry through white eyes. According to the album sleeves it is said:
“Django’s influence had endured all the way through to Jimmy Hendrix, who is said to have named his group Band of Gypsies in Django’s honour, while an annual festival takes place in his honour in Liberchies, the village of his birth.” (Sleeve notes by Michael Heatley).
Very well then, we are grateful for the warmed up music, but what ever happened to Eddie South? Classical music couldn’t help him, but did jazz ever help him to survive?
The Intelligent Choice
By Menzi Maseko
Jazz musicians in the ’80s continued the fight against electric rock-fusion, but their music and artistry is often dismissed and the response to these players is often racist. Screwed up in their shallow understanding of politics, jazz critics and musicians—who were equally inept in the arena of thinking—called the music neo-conservative, “republican jazz” and, worst of all, the music of “young black men in suits.” It never came clear to those writers that, since the commercial world at large wanted disorder, sloppiness and over-amplified clichés, it took more courage to come out swinging..”– (JazzTimes article by Essayist and Jazz Critic Stanley Crouch)
At first I was torn between calling this article, The Intellectuals Choice or Race Blues and Tenacity, but then I thought both these would seem rather snobbish or even audacious to a first time reader; after all we are strive to woo more readers and listeners towards the unconventional cultural experiences. The intelligent choice seemed more appropriate after reading the notoriously frank Stanley Crouch’s article, which was written 12 years ago. I could have also chosen to quote much more of his informative essays, but I thought the above was an apt and relevant to our purpose here.
What I will explore however briefly here is how music, specifically jazz and other more sidelined forms of artistic expression reflect the mood of each generation. Even though Crouch was essentially writing to decry the tendency of certain people to misinterpret the trajectory of jazz and mainstream music to a susceptible public, my purpose is to show that this did not just happen to jazz. It is true that jazz is still one of the most misunderstood of all musical genres, next to Hip-Hop and Dub Reggae. With that said, it must be made clear that these misinterpretations, misunderstandings and hence misappropriations were by no means honest mistakes. There have been and indeed continue to be certain personalities within the mass media, the music industry and even artists themselves whose business it is to double-deal, misinform, derail and hinder the natural progression of quality music. They do this in various subtle and sometimes noticeable ways, well perhaps noticeable to the intelligent observer of trends and to lovers of justice.
Jazz and most recently Reggae have been regarded as musical genres most frequently chosen by people of above average intelligence; and by this I don’t mean to suggest that lovers of classical, rhythm and blues, metal and other forms of music possess less scruples, not at all. What I mean to highlight is the general perception that these genres are associated with, which is that the music requires a little more deeper engagement, and that it tends to be generally more thought-provoking. This contributes to the fluctuation and often disappointing popularity of its practitioners. Unless one crosses over by blending their jazz or reggae with some other fashionable sound, they usually languish in relative obscurity often till the end of their lives. Now for many serious musicians, crossing over is just another nice way to say selling out.
The serious jazz and reggae artists most of the time epitomizes the proverbial ‘struggling artist’, rebel stigmata. Of course there are always those who rise above these stereotypes and manage to succeed in the competitive world of music without even striving to compete.
Stars such as MosesMolelekwa, ZimNgqawana, Darius Brubeck, Abdullah Ibrahim, Lucky Dube,FeyaFaku and the megastar Hugh Masekela are just a few of them. Although Masekeladoes not sit comfortably in any musical category, as an instrumentalist and an international musician he is still regarded by many as a jazz musician. This is also not a label that some of these artists have been comfortable with; indeed many of them have rejected the term completely.
The late Molelekwa was acknowledged by the young and the elderly alike as a phenomenal jazz genius even though he ‘transitioned’ at the age of 28; having released 3 or 4 albums that set him firmly as one of the brightest stars on the jazz constellation. Soft-spoken and equally difficult to pigeon-hole, he was however able to swing and truly earn the complement of jazz sensation. But what made these few people mainstream favorites aside from their prodigious phraseology of a distinctively South Afrikan jazz, is that they managed to capture the attention of certain contemporary opinion makers. There arevirtually hundreds of other equally or more capable artists who could have easily captivated the audience if their music was given the proper channel and platform, but many factors and circumstances conspired to not make it so.
Call it fate or coincidence, or perhaps the limited size of an appreciative audience, but one thing is for sure – it takes much more than pure talent to rise to the top.Crouch mentioned above that the ‘commercial world at large wanted disorder-‘and upon this did I aim to set my essay, but just like jazz improvisation, the writing decided to take a direction of its own.
Regardless, there is an alchemical or even metaphysical saying that ‘out of chaos comes order’, and this may somehow explain how certain types of artistic expressions may emerge and capture peoples attention far more than others, but in a world that has been proven to prefer superficiality, sensationalism and indeed disorder over dexterity and deep beauty,  it is not surprising to find that a few intelligent people will fill an obscure jazz club to listen to pure and expansive expression, while thousands more prefer to fill stadiums listening to lusterless and unimaginative noise. The crowded stadium keeps a lot of people happy, paid and intoxicated with glee while the dark jazz or reggae spot nurtures the deeper intelligences.
This is the existential chaos with which we must content ourselves with or else we can occasionally experience a bit of both worlds. Just like what I am listening to now, a ‘Hip Hoposist’ , the skillful and gifted Soweto Kinch who plays amazing tenor-saxophone and is just as comfortable rapping through a fusion of jazz and Hip Hop. He even raps, “Nobody gets it, nobody understands my rap/I don’t even have bus-fare back to my flat…”And right after that chaotically Hip Hop track, he launches into a melancholy tune titled Adrian’s Ballad, a sweeping ‘true jazz’ ballad in the bluesy mode of Louis Armstrong’s St James Infirmary. What can one say, who is really the judge, who can really claim to be the supreme guru of musical purity?
Crouch is known to be one of the most forceful of jazz purists, even reported to have punched a few people during arguments over his criticism of jazz.


Note these closing statements from the same Jazztimes article:Even though anything today can be called jazz or mainstream—however improperly—you can be sure that as long as you have musicians like Marsalis, Lovano, Roney, Roberts, Reed, Nash and Payton the music’s true sweep will be carried along and the true believers will not have to ask, “Is that jazz?””(S.C.)
Interestingly, the last musician on this list has also vehemently rejected the term jazz, opting for the more apt BAM: Black American Music. But is it really stilljust an American music, and isn’t it way past the Black and White definitions by now, and why not just call it Fresh Music?
Here’s what I think is a more intelligent choice of words:
Much of this problem arises from our diversity – and the desire to define everything according to demographics. Like any product in our free market economy – jazz has been codified, classified, and narrowed down to fit a small spectrum of very specific consumers . . . even though the essence of jazz appeals to all demographics by its very nature.
Those that have claimed jazz as their own over the years have managed to extricate it from any cultural relevance, and remove all vestiges of it from popular music. Sadly, this is often done in the name of preservation.” – (By Scott Fugate, in article called Jazz vs. BAM . . . Bridges vs. walls, In defense of America's original, indigenous art form.)
Does it matter whether the two essayists I have quoted are Black or White, does their racial profile determine the objectivity and intelligence of their observations?  At the end of the day, you might find both of them at the same club or in the privacy of their homes, wholeheartedly enjoying the sounds of what most of us consider good music. Some of the tinges in the Fugate playlist may be infused with reggae undertones, while Crouches playlist might have some elements of Madlib’s Hip-Hop fused into it, which is to say that they both can’t still call it fresh, ingenious and enjoyable music.
Yet again, creative artists no longer have to rely on radio or filling stadiums in order to make a decent living, lo and behold, we now have the ultra-efficient and virtual world of the internet. On the net, you can call it what you want, be brilliant or truly shallow, but as long as you can solicit more hits than the intelligent purist, you’re a star and a self-made millionaire.

Menzi Maseko